Service
In-depth, authorized manual web application penetration testing across authenticated and unauthenticated surfaces, combining manual exploitation with tool-assisted analysis to identify exploitable risk and provide engineers with actionable remediation guidance.
Coverage areas applied through manual validation and tool-assisted analysis.
Testing is anchored in the OWASP Top 10 and the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide, combined with structured manual validation against the application's real business logic. Automated scans are used only to extend coverage — they never substitute for human verification.
Each finding is reproduced, verified, and documented with evidence. False positives are removed before reporting so engineering teams spend remediation time on real issues.
What you receive at the close of the engagement.
Organizations and product teams that most commonly engage us for this assessment.
Common moments in a product or compliance lifecycle where this assessment adds the most value.
A typical engagement moves through the following phases. Exact durations vary with scope and complexity.
Assets, user roles, environments, and success criteria are agreed and documented.
Written authorization and Rules of Engagement are signed before any testing begins.
We map the application, endpoints, user roles, and trust boundaries.
Manual exploitation across authentication, access control, injection, and business logic.
Every finding is reproduced and confirmed against live behavior; false positives removed.
Executive summary and technical findings with evidence and prioritized remediation.
Engineer-ready walkthrough of findings, remediation options, and risk trade-offs.
Verification that reported issues have been resolved after remediation.
Illustrative only. Not a real client engagement. Provided to convey the level of detail included in reports.
Answers to the questions clients most often ask before engaging us for this assessment.
Most engagements take one to three weeks depending on application size, number of user roles, and the depth of business logic. We agree on a specific window during scoping.
Testing is anchored in the OWASP Top 10 and the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (WSTG), combined with structured manual validation against the application's real business logic.
Every finding is verified manually. Automated scans are used to extend coverage, but they never replace human validation, and false positives are removed before reporting.
We prefer a dedicated staging environment. When production testing is required, we agree on rate limits, avoid destructive payloads, and coordinate a testing window with your team.
Yes. Each finding includes prioritized, engineer-ready remediation guidance, including framework-specific recommendations where relevant.
Yes. We sign mutual NDAs before receiving any documentation or credentials and follow strict data handling practices throughout the engagement.
Yes. A retest summary is available at the close of the engagement to confirm that reported issues have been resolved.
An executive summary, detailed technical findings with reproduction steps, severity and business impact ratings, evidence, prioritized remediation guidance, an optional retest summary, and an engineer-ready debrief session.
Additional context on how we work, what we deliver, and how we protect client data.
